5 Aug “The Taj Mahal has identical entrance arches on all four sides. Not true at all. . P.N Oak – The Taj Mahal is a Temple Palace Is the Taj Mahal being Tejo Mahalaya story true, especially according to Chinmayee Raj? . to rebuilt in her memory had similar name, or maybe this is the biggest plot hole in Prof. oak’s theory. Taj Mahal: The True Story [P. N. Oak] on taken from the Taj Mahal by Prof Marvin Mills of the Pratt Institute Archaeological History Department. 21 Jun “A book by Prof P N Oak “Taj Mahal the true story” apparently reveals the Taj Mahal to have been a Hindu Temple/palace – built by a Hindu.
|Published (Last):||22 September 2018|
|PDF File Size:||3.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
While it is a well-known ture that Muslim stoory did play foul with India’s rich heritage, Taj Mahal was among them, is not mentioned by ano one. History books written by him have inspired several court cases to correct the history based on his theories.
Books have been a source of knowledge for many centuries. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. No one has ever challenged it except Prof. Apr 03, Mahatma, Subhas Chandra Bose were fond of each other.
I will always support for this thing he mentioned in his book Whereas there is ample historical evidence that documents the construction of the Taj Mahal on this spot, he said. Dozens of blogs and websites refer to him as “Professor” P. Accessibility links Skip to article Skip to navigation.
In India’s Supreme Court dismissed Oak’s petition to declare that a Hindu king had built the Taj Mahal by saying he had a “bee in his bonnet” about the Taj. Retrieved 2 September Oak petitioned the Indian parliament demanding that the Taj be declared a Hindu monument and that cenotaphs and sealed apartments be opened to determine whether lingams or other remains were hidden in them.
P. N. Oak – Wikipedia
Aug 11, Kartik Krushna 10, Kaliyug Varsha I read this when it was available in the market and found it is very interesting and a real eye opener for Indian who care for our heritage and valuable architecture. AFP “I am not saying this in air but there are documents to prove this,” he said.
Upload photo files with. An interesting perspective to read. He wrote books in three languages. Oak, ; online version further argue this position.
By Andrew MarszalNew Delhi.
In his book Taj Mahal: Archived from the original PDF on 9 January Tillotoson adds that no evidence is offered by Oak to redate it to thirteen centuries earlier. Oak finds some mention in passing as trustworthy in academic literature on the Hindutva wing of Hindu nationalism. The questions asked by Oak seem to be logicaland the modern scholars need to answer these one by one.
Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. The Indian government has maintained that out of respect for the dead, unnecessary openings of cenotaphs and sealed rooms cannot be allowed.
Sugam Anand, who heads the history pprof of Dr. Today, the same claims have thf taken up by some members of the ruling BJP, the Hindu nationalist party led by prime minister Narenda Modi. Thank you for rating this Product. Pardon if I got anything beyond control but this is how I think. Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Hindu Communalism”. Govt should sincerely try to tam to truth out of Taj and other historical monuments to put the stories to rest.
Besides being on the top of the world’s ‘Wonders List’, the Taj Mahal also ranks high on the list of monuments connected to controversies. You have been loggedin via facebook.
Oak says that well-known western authorities on architecture including Ernest Binfield HavellMrs.
Error (Too Many Requests) – Quora
They range from brilliant intellectuals like Aurobindoto professional scholars like B. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.
Oak also stpry the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Apr 10, There was a grave on one raised platform in Musti village. The petition, which was accepted by the Agra Court, names a Hindu deity as its main plaintiff.
It does not matter what caste, class, communityorganisationqualificationgroup LeftRi In his book Taj Mahal: Owk is right or wrong.
Was the Taj Mahal originally an ancient Hindu temple?
The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate. In the course o That, though, has not stopped his writings being widely circulated online.
Tell us what you didn’t like in the comments. He adds that Oak claims Mughals built nothing and only converted Hindu buildings.